🔗 Share this article

Law enforcement agencies across the United Kingdom effectively campaigned to deploy a facial recognition system acknowledged as biased against women, youths, and individuals from minority ethnic backgrounds, after complaining that a more accurate version generated a reduced number of investigative leads.

The Technology in Practice

UK forces use the national police database to carry out searches using historical face recognition. This process involves comparing a reference photograph of a suspect against a repository of over 19 million mugshots to identify potential matches.

Acknowledged Discrimination

The UK interior ministry conceded last week that the system was biased. This admission followed a study by the government's National Physical Laboratory found it incorrectly matched people of Black and Asian heritage and women at significantly higher rates than white men. The ministry said it “took steps on the findings”.

“It prompts the question of whether facial recognition only becomes useful if users tolerate discrimination in ethnicity and sex. Operational ease is a poor argument for overriding basic freedoms.”

Long-Standing Problem

Official papers show that this discriminatory flaw has been known about for over twelve months. Furthermore, police forces argued to overturn an initial decision that was designed to address the problem.

Senior officers were notified of the system's bias in September 2024. The government-ordered NPL review concluded the system was more likely to suggest false positives for images depicting females, Black people, and those under 40 years old.

A Policy U-Turn

In reaction, the national police leadership body ordered that the accuracy setting required for possible hits be increased to a level where the disparity was significantly reduced.

However, this decision was overturned the following month following complaints from police that the adjusted system was producing a lower number of “investigative leads”. Internal records indicate the stricter setting cut the number of queries that yielded possible identifications from over half to a mere under 15%.

Profound Inequalities

Although the Home Office and NPCC declined to specify what threshold is now in operation, the latest independent review discovered the system could generate false positives for women of Black heritage almost 100 times more frequently than for Caucasian women at certain settings.

The Home Office stated on these results: “Our evaluation found that in a limited set of circumstances the software is has a greater tendency to incorrectly include some population segments in its search results.”

Balancing Utility and Fairness

Describing the effect of the brief increase to the system's confidence threshold, the NPCC documents note: “The change significantly reduces the impact of bias across protected characteristics of race, age and sex but had a substantially detrimental effect on police efficiency”. The papers further note that police units complained that “a previously useful tool returned results of questionable value”.

Broader Rollout Plans

Meanwhile, the UK administration has opened a ten-week consultation on its proposals to widen the use of facial recognition technology. The minister for police the relevant minister has labeled the tool as the “biggest breakthrough since DNA matching”.

Expert and Oversight Concerns

The chair of a police oversight board, head of the advisory panel for the national policing equality strategy, said: “We observed scant discussion in race action plan meetings of the technology deployment even with clear relevance with the plan’s concerns.

“These revelations show yet again that the pledges to combat discrimination policing has undertaken via the race action plan are not being translated into wider practice. Our reports have cautioned that innovative tools are being implemented in a landscape where ethnic inequalities, inadequate oversight and poor data collection already persist.

“All deployment of this technology must adhere to strict national standards, be subject to external review, and demonstrate it diminishes rather than compounds racial disparity.”

Official Statement

A Home Office spokesperson stated: “We takes the conclusions of the study seriously and we have already taken action. A updated software has been independently tested and procured, which has demonstrated no measurable discrimination. It will be trialled in the coming months and will be undergo further assessment.

“Our priority is protecting the public. This revolutionary tool will assist police to apprehend and prosecute offenders. There is officer review in each stage of the process and no arrest or charge would be taken without specialist personnel carefully reviewing the output.”