🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities will be slashed by more than half, following a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.